Volvo XC60 is 648 mm (25.5 in) shorter than Ford Ranger Raptor.
Volvo XC60 is 272 mm (10.7 in) lower than Ford Ranger Raptor.
Volvo XC60 has a wheelbase 404 mm (15.9 in) shorter than Ford Ranger Raptor.
Blue solid line: Ford Ranger Raptor; orange dashed line: Volvo XC60.The outlines are generic body shapes drawn at one scale, not the real design of any model.
Ford Ranger Raptor is 5,357 mm (210.9 in) long and 1,928 mm (75.9 in) high, with a wheelbase of 3,269 mm (128.7 in). Volvo XC60 is 4,709 mm (185.4 in) long and 1,656 mm (65.2 in) high, with a wheelbase of 2,865 mm (112.8 in).
Volvo XC60 is 125 mm (4.9 in) narrower than Ford Ranger Raptor.
Blue solid line: Ford Ranger Raptor; orange dashed line: Volvo XC60.
Ford Ranger Raptor is 2,027 mm (79.8 in) wide and 1,928 mm (75.9 in) high. Volvo XC60 is 1,902 mm (74.9 in) wide and 1,656 mm (65.2 in) high.
Blue solid line: Ford Ranger Raptor; orange dashed line: Volvo XC60.
Ford Ranger Raptor is 2,027 mm (79.8 in) wide and 1,928 mm (75.9 in) high. Volvo XC60 is 1,902 mm (74.9 in) wide and 1,656 mm (65.2 in) high.
Compare specifications
A check mark shows the better value in a row. Range and efficiency check marks compare only values from the same test cycle. Prices are each market's own list prices, compared within that market; some include tax and some do not, and no price is marked better when the tax treatment differs. Energy cost is what the energy for 100 km (100 mi where the market uses miles) costs at the market's latest published national energy price, in its own currency, with the price's source and date.
Source detailsDrivetrain AWD = 4x4 (page). Power: premium-fuel rating. Combined fuel: NRCan source. Exact factors: in x 25.4; hp x 0.745699872; lb-ft x 1.3558179483314004.
Range and efficiency: Natural Resources Canada, Fuel Consumption Ratings, checked . open.canada.ca
Source detailsNRCan Fuel Consumption Ratings, model year 2026 (Open Government Licence - Canada): model text "Ranger Raptor 4WD", engine 3.0 L, transmission AS10, Combined (L/100 km) 14.0. Matched to this version by model, engine, transmission and drive; EPA cross-check 13.8 L/100 km (fueleconomy.gov: Ford Ranger RAPTOR 4WD 2026 Part-time 4-Wheel Drive Automatic (S10) 17 mpg (id 50105)). https://open.canada.ca/data/dataset/98f1a129-f628-4ce4-b24d-6f16bf24dd64
Other specifications: Manufacturer official pages, cited per row, checked . www.ford.com
Source detailsFills an empty field only.
Volvo XC60
Specifications: Manufacturer official pages, cited per row, checked . www.volvocars.com
Source detailsB5 AWD Gas (mild hybrid) column; https://www.volvocars.com/us/cars/xc60/specifications/ -> length_mm "Vehicle length 185.4 in Wheelbase 112.8 in"; wheelbase_mm (same row); height_mm "Exterior Height 65.2 in"; width_mm "Front track width 66.0 in Width 74.9 in" [plain Width row; the mirror-inclusive 83.3 is its own row]; seats "Number of seats 5 Curb weight 4137.2 lb"; curb_weight_kg (same row); power_kw "184 kWh / 247 hp Max torque 296 lb-ft" [label kWh as printed, hp used; preliminary]; torque_nm (same row); fuel_consumption_epa_l100km "29 MPG highway/26 MPG combined" [EPA est.]; cargo_liters "Cargo capacity - second row up 17.1 cu. ft." [second row up]. EPA cross-check: fueleconomy.gov 2027 XC60 B5 AWD combined 26 mpg = page 26 mpg. Exact factors: cu ft x 28.316846592; hp x 0.745699872; in x 25.4; l/100km = 235.214583 / mpg; lb x 0.45359237; lb-ft x 1.3558179483314004.