Approximate, from ECB reference rates. Not an offer.
Dacia Duster vs Kia Sportage
Key differences
Dacia Duster is 341 mm (13.4 in) shorter than Kia Sportage and has 527 L less cargo space.Dacia Duster is 341 mm (13.4 in) shorter than Kia Sportage and has 527 L (18.6 cu ft) less cargo space.
Kia Sportage makes 36 kW (49 hp) more power than Dacia Duster.
Kia Sportage is 341 mm (13.4 in) longer than Dacia Duster.
Kia Sportage is 45 mm (1.8 in) taller than Dacia Duster.
Kia Sportage has a wheelbase 99 mm (3.9 in) longer than Dacia Duster.
Blue solid line: Dacia Duster; orange dashed line: Kia Sportage.The outlines are generic body shapes drawn at one scale, not the real design of any model.
Dacia Duster is 4,343 mm (171 in) long and 1,616 mm (63.6 in) high, with a wheelbase of 2,657 mm (104.6 in). Kia Sportage is 4,684 mm (184.4 in) long and 1,661 mm (65.4 in) high, with a wheelbase of 2,756 mm (108.5 in).
Kia Sportage is 51 mm (2 in) wider than Dacia Duster.
Blue solid line: Dacia Duster; orange dashed line: Kia Sportage.
Dacia Duster is 1,813 mm (71.4 in) wide and 1,616 mm (63.6 in) high. Kia Sportage is 1,864 mm (73.4 in) wide and 1,661 mm (65.4 in) high.
Blue solid line: Dacia Duster; orange dashed line: Kia Sportage.
Dacia Duster is 1,813 mm (71.4 in) wide and 1,616 mm (63.6 in) high. Kia Sportage is 1,864 mm (73.4 in) wide and 1,661 mm (65.4 in) high.
Compare specifications
A check mark shows the better value in a row. Range and efficiency check marks compare only values from the same test cycle. Prices are each market's own list prices, compared within that market; some include tax and some do not, and no price is marked better when the tax treatment differs. Energy cost is what the energy for 100 km (100 mi where the market uses miles) costs at the market's latest published national energy price, in its own currency, with the price's source and date.
Source detailsNatural Resources Canada, Fuel Consumption Ratings MY2026 (2026-10-06), Open Government Licence - Canada: Kia Sportage [2.5L AS8] combined CO2 194 g/km (5-cycle test, combined 55% city / 45% highway); same test as EPA, cross-checked with fueleconomy.gov vehicle 49455 = 197.0 g/km. https://open.canada.ca/data/dataset/98f1a129-f628-4ce4-b24d-6f16bf24dd64
Test cycles differ (WLTP and EPA), so these rows are not compared.